![]() |
14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS-14)San Francisco, CA, USA |
![]() |
Casual speech tends to exhibit a larger proportion of reduced
sound segments than careful speech; e.g. she packs shorts,
will be /ʃi pæk ʃɔ:ts/ rather than /ʃi: pæks
ʃɔ:ts/. In the present
paper, we ask whether we can find comparable effects in
English intonation.
Pitch accent distribution in three speaking styles was
examined: read, semi-spontaneous and spontaneous speech.
The data were taken from the IViE corpus [1], and were
transcribed prosodically in the IViE labelling system, an
autosegmental-metrical transcription system for comparative
intonation analysis. After labelling, pitch accent types were
counted and compared. The results showed that in casual
speech, speakers used fewer complex pitch accents than in
careful speech. Our findings offer support for autosegmental
approaches to intonation analysis such as the ones proposed
by [2] and [3] which allow for a number of phonological
processes in intonation, including continuous speech
processes.
Bibliographic reference. Evans, Bronwen / Grabe, Esther (1999): "Connected speech processes in intonation", In ICPhS-14, 33-36.